IUT definition on Social Housing

Most liveable cities, 2009

2010 UN World Population and Housing Census


EU, Europe:

Statistics from RICS:

Construction

Statistics from EU Presidencies:

VAT rates applicable in EU member States, 2005:



The UN-ECE-region:

The World, except Europe:

 


Page top     Home


Housing in Europe, various countries

  • England:


Page top     Home


NB; For more USA Facts & Figures, go to Members USA

 
Western Europe
+
USA, Canada, Australia, New Zeeland

The share of the rental sector, < 1999, and 2000 > 
(in % of the total housing stock)
   Last update: 2010-02-01   

 
 Country

Total rental 1998/1999,
in %

Total rental 2000 >

of which is Social,
in %

Renters in major cities, %, various years 98-

 Austria - 45 (-08) 26 (-08) Vienna 77 (-03)
 Belgium 35 - 7 (-04) Brussels 57
 Cyprus - 14 (-01) 0 -
 Denmark 45 46 (-05)
(20 % public)
Copenhagen 47 (-07)
(public: 22, private: 25)
 Finland 28(-99) 34 (-02) 15 (-02)

Helsinki  47 (-01)

 France 40 (-96) 38 (-06) 16 (-06) Paris: 53
 Germany   54 (-06) 6 (-06) Berlin 86 (-06)
Hamburg 80 (-06)
 Greece 20 (-94) - no social sector

Athens ~27 (-01)

 Iceland 14 (-00) 4 (-00)  
 Ireland 20(-91) 23(-02)

10(-91), 7(-02)

Dublin 28 (-01)
 Italy 25 (-90) 21 (-06) 8 (-05) -
 Luxembourg - 29 (-05) 1,5 (-05) -
 Malta - 22 (-05) - -
 The Netherlands 48 (-99) 44 (-06) 34 (-06) Amsterdam 73 (-07)
 Norway 24 19 (-07) 7 (-07) Oslo 30 (-01)
 Portugal 28 20 (-01) 5 -
 Spain 14 - 1

Barcelona 30 (-96)

 Sweden *1 40 44 (-06) (20 public) Stockholm 49 (-04)
 Switzerland 69 - 14 Geneva 85
  U.K. England - 31 (-07) 19 (-07) London 44 (-06)
(social: 24, private: 19)
U.K. North.Ireland   - 33 (-06) 17 (-08) -
 UK, Wales - 27 (02) - -
 
USA

36 % (-94)
32 % (-00)
30 % (-06)
32 % (-08)

 

2 %

New York 56 (-05)
Chicago 60
San-Francisco 65

Canada

36 %  (-99)
35 %  (-02)
31 % (-06)

 

6 %

Toronto: 49 (-01)
Vancouver: 39 % (-01)
Montréal: 50 % (-01)

Australia 27 % in 2006
(of Australians renting)
  6 %

Victoria State: 23 (-02)
ACT, Canberra: 37 (-99)
N. S.Wales: 28,5 (-06)

New Zeeland 26 % (-91)
29 % (-96)
35 % -(-04)
  5 %  Christchurch: ~30 (-02)

 

Remarks:
Public housing: "social" housing open to all residents, irrespective of income. (Sweden and Denmark)


Sources:
Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2006
ACT: Australian Bureau of Statistics Housing Survey 1999

Austria
: City of Vienna, W. Förster
Canada: Statistics Canada, Census 2006. Toronto, Vancouver, Montréal: Census of Canada 2001
Cyprus: 2001 Census
Denmark: Copenhagen figures: City of Copenhagen, 2007
England: National Statistics 2009. For London: Greater London Authority, GLA, 2009

Finland:
Housing Statistics in the EUU, 2007. Ministry of Environment: www.environment.fi 
France, INSEE France, 2006.
Germany;
Federal Statistical Statistics Office, 2006. (8 % vacant units)
Greece: Ministry of Environment, Physical Planning and Public Works, 2002.
Iceland: Martti Lujanen, Housing and Housing Policy in the Nordic countries, 2004.
Ireland: 2002 Census. Rented accommodation; 1991: 19.8 %, 2002:22.6 %, Social; 1991:9.7%, 2002: 6.9%
I
taly: Ministry of Infrastructure, Italy, 2006.
Luxembourg: Ministere des Classes Moyaennes, du Tourisme et du Logement (Jérome Krier), Housing Focal point 2005
Malta: Population and Housing Statistics, 2005
Netherlands: 2006, Dutch Ministry of Housing, VROM. Amsterdam: City of Amsterdam, 2007.
New Zeeland:
www.stats.govt.nz
Norway: Statistics Norway, 2008.
Portugal: INE, Census 2001

Spain: Housing Statistics in the EU, 2004.
Sweden: www.ssd.scb.se 2007. Tenant ownership: 19 %
Switzerland: Federal Office for Housing, Housing bulletin, 2006
U.K. Northern Ireland: Housing Executive
Northern Ireland "Housing Market Review and Perspectives 2009-2012". (5,5 % vacant dwellings 2006).
Private rental: 11% of total stock

U.K.Wales:www.wales.gov.uk/keypubstatisticsforwales/housing/stock.htm
USA, national figures: US Census Bureau, Annual Statistics, 2008. New York, 2005: NYC Gov.


*1: Sweden has no social housing. Public housing consists of about 300 municipally owned housing companies, which dwellings are open to anyone, irrespective of income. Priority via time in housing queue, and priority needs.


 

Page top     Home


 

Central and East Europe (CEE-region)

 The share of the rental sector in 1990 >
(In % of the total housing stock),
in red: last available figure.

Country

1990

1994

1998

1999

2001

2002 2003 >
Albania

-

-

5 *15

-

2 *15

-

 
Armenia

49

-

-

-

4 *19

-

 
Belarus 46 - - - - - 16 *23
(-08)
Bulgaria

7

6

-

7

-

3,5 *20

 
Croatia

26

11

10 *8

10 *8

10 *8

-

 
Czech Rep

59 *2

57 *2

55 *2

-

57 *12

-

40 *28
(-07)
Estonia

-

71

10

7

5

-

 
Georgia - - - - ~10 *24
(- 01)
   
Hungary

22 *2

13

6 *2

6 *1

4 *1

-

 
Latvia

64

54

51

38 (-00)*7

-

25 *7

21 *25
Lithuania

51

13

5

3

2,5 *5

   
Macedonia FYR of

-

-

-

-

2,5 *18

-

 
Moldova

71(-92) *4

64 *4

-

10(-00)

6

-

 
Poland *11

56

56

48

46

-

25 *13

24 *26
Romania

33 *3

8

-

5 *3

3 *16

   
Russia

67*17

50

41

-

37 *17

-

30 *17
(-06)
Serbia

-

-

-

-

-

2

 
Slovakia *6

21 (-91)

-

28 *2

-

8

-

3 *27
(-06)

Slovenia

33 (-91)

18 (-93)

12 (-96)

12*14

-

9 *22

 
Turkey

-

-

-

-

36 *21

-

 
- = not available
*1 : Hungary: 1999: Hungarian Tenants Assoc., LABE, 2001: J. Hegedüs MRI, 2003.
*2 Czech Rep. Institute of Sociology, Prague. Social Housing in Europe 2000,Figures include co-operatives: Czech Rep; -90: 20%, -98: 23%, (Most co-operatives had by 1995 been privatised in the Czech Rep.)
*3 Romania: UN-ECE 2001, Country Profiles on the Housing Sector.
*4 Moldova: 2001: Ministry of Public Works, Reconstruction and Construction (96% private - 4% public sector)
*5 Lithuania: Ministry of the Environment, Vilnius.
*6 Slovakia: Co-operative dwellings 1991: 22 %, 2001: 15 %, (
ownership 2001: 75 %): K. Ivanička / A. Elbers
2006 figure from
Ministry of Construction and Regional Development, Bratislava 2008
*7 Latvia: Census 2000, www.csb.lv. 2002: OECD / Min. of Economics of the Rep of Latvia.
*8 Croatian Union of Tenants.
*9 Slovenia: Faculty of Economics and Institute for Economic Research
*10
*11 Poland: State office for Housing and Urban Dev. / Info. Bulletin 2001. Figures incl. co-operatives.
*12 Czech statistical office, Census 2001.
*13 Source see below*. 25 % rental of which 9 % co-operative rental, 11,5 % from municipalities, 1,5 % from State treasury, 2 % from employers, 1 % others.
*14 Slovenia: for 2000, Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning.
*15 Albania:1998: UN-ECE Country Profiles on the Housing Sector, Albania. 2001: Ministry of Territory Planning and Tourism, Tirana
*16 Romania: Ministry of Public Works, Transport and Housing, Bucharest
*17 Russia: 2001:Gosstroy of Russia (UN-ECE –02), 2002:UN ECE
Country Profiles on the Housing Sector 2004.
2006 figure: Federal’naia sluzhba gosudarstvennoi statistiki. (Federal Service of State Statistics). 1990 figure: Source: Berezin et. al. 1996, 84. (from R. Vihavainen; Homeowners’ Associations in Russia after the 2005 Housing Reform, 2009.)
*18 FYR Macedonia: Habitat National report, 2001
*19 Armenia: UN-ECE 2004: Country Profiles on the Housing Sector.
*20 Bulgaria: Reg. National Reports on Housing Developments in European Countries, 2004.
*21 Turkey, for 2000. 36 % of which 27 % i rented, 7,5 % rent free, 1,5% gov. owned.
*22 Slovenia: 6 % gov.or local auth. rental, 0,5 social, 2,5 private rental.
*23 Belarus:
UN-ECE Country Profiles on the Housing Sector, 2008
*24 Georgia: UN-ECE Country Profiles on the Housing Sector, 2007
*25 Latvia: Housing Statistics in the EU, 2004.
*26 Poland: Housing Statistics in the EU, 2004
*27 Slovakia; Housing Statistics in the EU, 2004
*28 Czech Statistical Office, 2007 via Institute of Sociology, Academy of Sciences. Prague; 63 % rental housing

Bosnia-Herzegovina,
1991 census: 20% state owned housing, 80% privately owned

*13, 21, 22: Reg. National Reports on Housing Developments in European Countries, 2004: Department of the Environment. , Heritage and Local Government. Rep. of Ireland. In cooperation with The Housing Unit, Dublin.

 

Page top     Home


 

Housing in USA

Homeownership in the USA
 Rates by Race and Ethnicity of Householder

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2002

U.S. total

64.0

64.7

65.4

65.7

66.3

66.8

67.4

67.9

White, total

67.7

68.7

69.1

69.3

70.0

70.5

71.1

71.8

  White, non-Hispanic

70.0

70.9

71.7

72.0

72.6

73.2

73.8

74.5

Black, total

42.3

42.7

44.1

44.8

45.6

46.3

47.2

47.3

Other race1

47.7

47.2

51.0

52.5

53.0

53.7

53.5

54.7

American Indian, Aleut, Eskimo

51.7

55.8

51.6

51.7

54.3

56.1

56.2

54.6

  Asian or Pacific Islander

51.3

50.8

50.8

52.8

52.6

53.1

52.8

54.7

  Other

36.1

37.4

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

Hispanic

41.2

42.1

42.8

43.3

44.7

45.5

46.3

48.2

Non-Hispanic

65.9

66.7

67.4

67.8

68.3

68.9

69.5

70.0

 

NOTE: n.a. = not applicable.

1. Beginning in 1996, those answering “other” for race were allocated to one of the 4 race categories—white, black, American Indian, Aleut, or Eskimo (one category), or Asian or Pacific Islander.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau. Web: www.census.gov.

Page top     Home







Housing in Asia
 
See also IUT Members Asia

China, Peoples's Republic
 

Hong Kong
 

 

Israel

Lebanon


Malaysia
 


Singapore
 

South Korea



Vietnam
 

Page top     Home

Japan

 


                                   

Page top     Home                                                                        



 


 

 

 

 

International Union of Tenants

Tenants United - participation across borders